Report Abuse
Free Consultation
Free Consultation
855-880-4500
When most people hear the phrase "elder abuse," they picture someone over 65. California law extends identical protections to a much broader group: dependent adults. If your loved one is between 18 and 64 and has been abused, neglected, or financially exploited in a San Diego care facility or by a caregiver, they have the same legal rights as an elder and you have the same legal tools to pursue accountability. At The Elder Justice Firm, we represent dependent adults and their families throughout San Diego County in civil elder and dependent adult abuse cases. We investigate, litigate, and resolve cases at every level of severity, and we handle every matter on a contingency fee basis, meaning no fees unless we recover for you.
Under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15610.23, a dependent adult is any person between 18 and 64 years old who resides in California and who has physical or mental limitations that restrict their ability to carry out normal activities or protect their own rights. The statute also includes any person between 18 and 64 who is admitted as an inpatient to a 24-hour health facility, such as a hospital or skilled nursing facility, regardless of whether they otherwise meet the limitation criteria. The definition is intentionally broad because younger adults in institutional care face the same vulnerabilities as elderly residents and require the same legal protections.
In practice, the conditions that most commonly qualify someone as a dependent adult in San Diego care facilities include traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, advanced multiple sclerosis, ALS, severe developmental disability, serious mental illness requiring institutional placement, post-surgical recovery in a skilled nursing facility, and serious burns or other conditions requiring prolonged nursing care. Age is the only meaningful distinction between an elder abuse claim and a dependent adult abuse claim under California law. The legal protections, available remedies, pleading standards, and enforcement mechanisms are identical across both categories.
Dependent adults face a particularly serious vulnerability to abuse and neglect because their conditions often limit their ability to self-advocate. A resident with a spinal cord injury cannot reposition themselves to prevent bedsores. A patient with a traumatic brain injury may lack the communication ability to report pain, fear, or theft. A person with advanced multiple sclerosis may be entirely dependent on staff for food, water, hygiene, medication, and mobility. This total dependence is precisely the condition that California law recognizes as creating a heightened duty of care on the part of the facility.
According to the HHS Office of Inspector General, 22 percent of Medicare beneficiaries experienced adverse events during skilled nursing facility stays, and 59 percent of those events were found to be clearly or likely preventable. Physician reviewers attributed the preventable harm primarily to substandard treatment, inadequate resident monitoring, and failure or delay of necessary care. These statistics apply equally to dependent adult residents as to elderly residents.
Under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15610.07, abuse includes physical abuse, neglect, abandonment, isolation, and financial exploitation. Neglect under Section 15610.57 is the most common form of harm suffered by dependent adults in San Diego nursing homes and skilled nursing facilities. It includes failure to provide medical care, proper hygiene, adequate nutrition, and protection from health and safety hazards. A younger resident with a spinal cord injury who develops Stage 3 pressure ulcers because staff failed to reposition them has suffered neglect that is legally identical to the same harm suffered by an 80-year-old resident.
The clinical consequences of neglect are often the same regardless of the resident's age. Pressure ulcers develop when sustained pressure cuts off blood supply to tissue, which happens in younger patients with mobility limitations just as readily as in elderly patients. Infections spread, malnutrition develops, and falls occur in dependent adult populations at rates that parallel elder populations when the underlying cause is inadequate staffing and supervision.
Dependent adults are particularly vulnerable to financial exploitation because cognitive impairment, communication difficulties, or total dependence on caregivers can make it difficult to detect or report theft. Under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15610.30, financial abuse includes taking, secreting, or appropriating a dependent adult's property for a wrongful purpose or with intent to defraud, as well as undue influence over financial decisions. San Diego facilities that manage residents' personal accounts or receive their benefit payments can be in a position to exploit that access, particularly when the dependent adult has limited ability to monitor their own finances.
Dependent adults, particularly those with behavioral health diagnoses or traumatic brain injuries, are sometimes administered antipsychotic medications or sedatives for the convenience of staff rather than for legitimate therapeutic purposes. This constitutes physical abuse under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15610.63 when done without proper medical justification. Chemical restraint can cause serious lasting harm including increased fall risk, accelerated cognitive decline, dangerous drug interactions, and suppression of the alertness and communication abilities that the resident needs to self-advocate and maintain family relationships.
Isolation, defined under California law as acts that prevent an elder or dependent adult from receiving mail, telephone calls, or visitors, is a distinct category of abuse that can be particularly damaging for dependent adult residents whose social connections are already limited by their condition. Facilities that restrict family visits or interfere with a resident's communication with family members, particularly when doing so appears designed to prevent the family from observing signs of neglect, face independent liability for this category of abuse.
Our investigation process for San Diego dependent adult abuse cases is systematic and comprehensive. We begin with a request for the complete medical record, care plan, medication administration records, and incident reports from the facility. We simultaneously pull the facility's full inspection and citation history from the
CDPH Cal Health Find portal and quality measure scores from Medicare Care Compare, looking particularly at prior citations for the same category of failure that harmed the dependent adult we are representing. We review CMS Payroll Based Journal staffing data to assess whether the facility was meeting California's minimum direct care standard of 3.5 hours per resident per day under Health and Safety Code Section 1276.5. We retain qualified medical experts to establish the standard of care applicable to the dependent adult's specific condition and connect the facility's documented failures to the injuries at issue.
California's Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act, codified beginning at Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15600, provides the same powerful civil remedies for dependent adult abuse as for elder abuse. When the abuse or neglect resulted from reckless or malicious conduct, Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15657 requires the defendant to pay the plaintiff's reasonable attorney's fees and costs, lifts certain limitations on survival action damages, and opens the door to punitive damages. Financial abuse claims under Section 15657.5 carry a four-year statute of limitations from the date of discovery. Physical abuse and neglect claims are subject to the two-year limitation period under Code of Civil Procedure Section 335.1 from the date of the wrongful act.
The practical effect of the Elder Abuse Act in dependent adult cases is significant. Because dependent adult residents are often younger than traditional elder abuse victims, the non-economic losses from serious injuries can be larger: a 40-year-old with a spinal cord injury who develops preventable sepsis from bedsore neglect loses more years of potential life and relationship than an 85-year-old in the same situation. The Act's enhanced remedies ensure that the full scope of that loss is recoverable, and that attorney's fees do not create a barrier to pursuing justice.
Yes. When a dependent adult dies as a result of abuse or neglect, the surviving family members can file a wrongful death claim under
California Code of Civil Procedure Section 377.60
, and the estate can pursue a survival action under
Section 377.30
for the harm the dependent adult suffered before death. When the facility's conduct was reckless, the Elder Abuse Act allows recovery of the deceased's pre-death pain and suffering through the survival action, which is not available in standard wrongful death cases under California law.
No. Dependent adult abuse claims can arise from conduct by in-home caregivers, assisted living facilities, adult day programs, board and care homes, and any other setting where a caregiver has accepted responsibility for the dependent adult's care. The relationship of dependency and the caregiver's undertaking of a duty of care, not the specific physical setting, are the key legal elements.
Many dependent adult abuse cases involve residents who cannot communicate clearly due to their underlying condition. These cases are built entirely on documentary evidence: medical records showing the clinical trajectory, incident reports and their absence, care plan documentation gaps, staffing records, and expert testimony. The inability of the victim to testify does not prevent a successful claim and does not change the strength of the underlying legal theory.
If your loved one has been harmed in a San Diego nursing home or care facility, The Elder Justice Firm is ready to help. We handle every case on contingency, meaning no fees unless we recover for you. Contact us today for a free, confidential consultation.
We have won multi-million-dollar cases against public and private facilities on behalf of our clients. As a result, many institutions and their insurance companies opt to settle with us, based on our attorneys’ reputations.
Take The First Step
"*" indicates required fields
