Report Abuse
Free Consultation
Free Consultation
855-880-4500
When a family is choosing a nursing home for a loved one, or when they are trying to determine whether a loved one's pressure ulcer was preventable, publicly available data on bedsore rates is one of the most important resources they have. At The Elder Justice Firm, we help families in Orange County understand what facility performance data means, where to find it, and how it can support a legal claim when pressure ulcers result from neglect. This article explains the data landscape, what the numbers mean, and what to do when a loved one develops a bedsore in a California nursing home.
Pressure ulcers, also called bedsores or decubitus ulcers, are injuries that form when prolonged, unrelieved pressure cuts off blood flow to skin and tissue. The CDC National Center for Health Statistics reports that approximately 11 percent of nursing home residents have pressure ulcers at any given time, with Stage 2 ulcers being the most common. Because the majority of pressure ulcers are preventable with consistent repositioning, daily skin assessment, adequate nutrition, and proper wound care, the rate at which a facility's residents develop new ulcers is one of the clearest available measures of how well that facility is actually performing its core caregiving duties.
The federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services uses pressure ulcer rates as one of its key quality measures for the Medicare Care Compare nursing home rating system. Facilities that report high rates of new or worsening pressure ulcers among long-stay residents receive lower quality scores, which affects their star ratings. Families can check any licensed California nursing home's bedsore quality scores, inspection history, and staffing levels on that database.
The most comprehensive published analysis of pressure ulcer rates in nursing homes comes from a 47-study meta-analysis published in the International Journal of Nursing Studies. That analysis found an overall pressure injury prevalence of 11.6 percent among older long-term care residents across all stages. When Stage 1 injuries are excluded and only more serious ulcers are counted, the prevalence drops to 7.2 percent. The facility-acquired pressure ulcer rate, meaning ulcers that likely developed inside the facility after admission, was 8.5 percent. That distinction between ulcers present on admission and those that develop inside a facility is critical: the facility-acquired rate is the number that reflects the quality of care the facility is actually providing.
For more serious wounds, the data is sobering. The same meta-analysis found that Stage 3 pressure ulcers had an incidence rate of approximately 4 percent in nursing home settings, and Stage 4 ulcers had an incidence rate of approximately 4 percent as well. Both Stage 3 and Stage 4 ulcers are classified as "never events" in clinical medicine, meaning they should not occur when proper care is provided.
Federal law requires nursing homes to report pressure ulcer data through the CMS Minimum Data Set assessment system. That data feeds into several publicly accessible tools:
Research consistently shows that nursing home staffing levels directly drive pressure ulcer rates. The connection is straightforward: proper bedsore prevention requires repositioning residents in bed at least every two hours and while seated every 15 minutes, conducting daily skin assessments, assisting with nutrition and hydration, and promptly managing incontinence. All of these tasks require staff time. When a facility does not have enough certified nursing assistants to meet these demands, residents are left in position for too long, skin assessments are skipped, and wounds develop. Under California Health and Safety Code Section 1276.5, skilled nursing facilities are required to provide a minimum of 3.5 direct care service hours per resident per day. Facilities that consistently fall below this threshold, or that meet it only on paper through questionable staffing calculations, are the ones most likely to produce preventable pressure ulcers.
The HHS Office of Inspector General has documented the connection between lower nurse staffing levels and worse resident outcomes across multiple categories of preventable harm. Facilities with lower staffing consistently have higher rates of the adverse events, including pressure ulcers, that reflect inadequate hands-on care.
A facility's pattern of pressure ulcer citations or consistently elevated bedsore quality scores on Medicare Care Compare does not automatically prove that any individual resident's wound resulted from neglect. But it is powerful contextual evidence. When an attorney can show that a facility had prior CDPH citations for pressure ulcer care failures, consistently low staffing scores, and documented repositioning gaps in a specific resident's care plan, the combination supports a finding that the resident's wound was the foreseeable product of the same systemic failures that caused prior problems.
Under California's Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act, Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15600, when a facility's neglect is reckless rather than merely negligent, families can pursue enhanced damages and attorney's fees in addition to compensation for the resident's injuries. A pattern of prior violations is directly relevant to whether the facility's conduct reached that higher threshold.
Search the facility by name on the CDPH Cal Health Find portal, which shows the complete inspection and citation history for every licensed California nursing home, including the full text of Statements of Deficiency. Cross-reference that with the facility's quality scores on Medicare Care Compare, which shows pressure ulcer rates for long-stay residents specifically. Both tools are free and do not require an account.
A high rate is a significant warning sign that warrants investigation, but it reflects aggregate facility data and does not prove what happened to any individual resident. Conversely, a facility with a low published bedsore rate is not necessarily safe, because the OIG has documented that nursing homes underreport adverse events in their self-reported data. The best approach is to use both Medicare Care Compare and the CDPH inspection history together, and to consult an attorney if a loved one develops a pressure ulcer, regardless of the facility's published ratings.
Yes. When a resident dies from sepsis or other complications related to an untreated or undertreated pressure ulcer, the facility's prior citation history for pressure ulcer failures, combined with the specific medical record documentation of how the wound developed, can support a wrongful death claim under both California negligence law and the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act. An attorney can review the records and advise whether the evidence supports a viable claim.
If your loved one developed a pressure ulcer in an Orange County nursing home, you deserve to know whether the facility failed them. At The Elder Justice Firm, we review facility data, medical records, and inspection histories to build cases when preventable pressure ulcers result from neglect. We handle all cases on contingency, meaning no fees unless we recover for you. Contact us today for a free, confidential consultation.
We have won multi-million-dollar cases against public and private facilities on behalf of our clients. As a result, many institutions and their insurance companies opt to settle with us, based on our attorneys’ reputations.
Take The First Step
"*" indicates required fields
